Ethics in Professional Helping is the study of values and principles of ethical decision making. Topics in the course are ethical dilemmas, critical thinking, professional code of ethics, and common morality. Each topic is evaluated through a biblical worldview.
For information regarding prerequisites for this course, please refer to the Academic Course Catalog.
Professional helpers face ethical dilemmas on a regular basis. This course prepares students with foundational knowledge necessary for understanding the complexity and ambiguity of ethical dilemmas while exploring critical thinking and ethical decision-making. It reviews codes of ethics from a variety of helping professions including humans services, social work, and psychology.
Measurable Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this course, the student will be able to:
Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior (CSWE Competency 1)
- Make ethical decisions by applying the standards of the NASW Code of Ethics, relevant laws and regulations, models for ethical decision-making, ethical conduct of research, and additional codes of ethics as appropriate to context.
- Use reflection and self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism in practice situations.
- Demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and oral, written and electronic communication.
- Use technology ethically and appropriately to facilitate practice outcomes.
- Use supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior.
The student will complete 4 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 350 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, and other scholarly sources.
Students will write an analysis integrating various sources of knowledge – the textbook, the Bible, and the NASW Code of Ethics. This paper will be broken into two parts.
The first part of this paper is addressing your initial gut reaction. You will start by describing the ethical dilemma that you chose from the approved list. Then you will describe your “gut” reaction to this problem.
- This paper should be 3-4 pages long.
- An abstract is not necessary; however, a correctly formatted title and reference page are required. The title and reference page are not included in the page length.
- This paper should be written in current APA format.
- The proper use of headings will help organize your paper.
The paper must align with the following guidelines:
- Describe the ethical dilemma.
- Describe the scenario in your own words. Do NOT copy and paste.
- Define the actual dilemma - This is the decision that you must make.
- Whom does the dilemma impact (or whom could it potentially impact) and how? This is the ripple effect of the dilemma. Think deeply and broadly, and demonstrate that you understand the impact of the dilemma.
- Describe the competing values present in the dilemma from the list of 6 social work values in the NASW Code of Ethics. How are the values relevant in this the dilemma, and how do they compete with each other?
- Describe your first “gut” solution to the problem.
- This section should demonstrate not only an understanding of the NASW Code of Ethics, but also self-awareness and an understanding of how your own experiences have shaped how you make decisions. Simply stating the decision that you would make will not suffice. This section is where you will discuss not only what you would do, but why.
For this part, you will use the morality framework (from the course text) to evaluate your initial “gut reaction” solution to the ethical dilemma. Considering what you wrote as your initial “gut” solution, you will apply that solution/decision to the framework presented in the textbook. After working through each step of the framework, you will re-evaluate your initial “gut” solution, and develop at least two alternative solutions (at least one must be biblically principled). Additionally, you will address the role that supervision and consultation would have within this dilemma.
- This paper must be at least 4 pages long.
- The title and reference page are not included in this page count.
- Include part one of the paper in this submission (Part one will not be graded for this part; it is included only for reference).
- This paper should be written in current APA formatting.
The paper must align with the following guidelines:
- Use the morality framework (Step 1, #1–10 and Step 2) on pages 41–46 to analyze the ethical dilemma. Please number the steps in your paper and use level two headings to organize your paper. Do not write this portion in paragraph form.
- If any of the steps are not applicable to your situation, please note this in your paper. Simply leaving the steps out, or marking them N/A will result in a loss of points. You need to explain why the step is not applicable, in order to demonstrate your understanding of each particular step. Thoughtful analysis for each step should be applied here.
- Re-evaluate your initial “gut” solution.
- Now that you have worked through your initial solution utilizing the framework, analyze your solution. This section should demonstrate an ability to see all sides of a dilemma, and make decisions that reflect social work values and a focus on the client. Simply stating, "I still agree with my initial reaction," will not suffice here.
- Describe at least two alternative solutions and provide a rationale for each. At least 1 of the solutions must reflect a biblical worldview, and you must support this solution with scripture and biblical principles. This area should reflect your ability to conceptualize alternative actions, and how those actions will impact your client.
- Discuss how you could use supervision and consultationas a resource when evaluating the potential solutions.
- What would be the benefit in talking with your supervisor about this dilemma? How would you approach your supervisor about this situation?
- Are there others who would be appropriate to consult about this particular situation? If so, who and how do you think they could be of assistance to you?
- What additional resources could you examine (e.g. agency policy, State or federal laws, etc.) to assist you in evaluating the potential solutions?
Each quiz will cover the course material for the module in which it is assigned. Each quiz will be open-book/open-notes, contain 5 multiple-choice and true/false questions, and have a 10-minute time limit. Quizzes assess Competency 1 - Ethical and Professional Behavior (knowledge).
The Quiz: Midterm will cover the first 4 chapters of the text, and will contain 25 multiple-choice and true/false questions and have a time limit of 60 minutes. The Quiz: Final will cover Chapters 5–9 and the required articles and will contain 50 multiple-choice and true/false questions and have a time limit of 90 minutes. Quizzes assess Competency 1 - Ethical and Professional Behavior (knowledge).